For nearly two millennia, the masses have been deliberately sold a counterfeit good news—a theological substitution engineered to hide the authority and power of the Redeemer’s true Name, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha). After Rome absorbed and restructured the early assembly, new doctrines and creeds replaced the original Hebraic command. Among the most significant of these changes was the later triple-formula insertion in MatithYAHU (Matthew) 28:19—“in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit”—a wording absent from the earliest quotations and unknown to the first-century taught ones.
As Greek and Latin scribes altered the text to align with emerging church doctrine, the singular Name preached by the early emissaries was gradually replaced with a formula that diluted and redirected authority away from 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha) Himself. Combined with the linguistic corruption that produced the fabricated name “jesus,” Rome constructed a religious framework that obscured the one Name that saves, and elevated a man-made system above the original command of the Mashiach.
This truth lays bare the lie and exposes the singular reality buried beneath centuries of doctrinal manipulation, Roman decree, and religious deception: there has always been one Name, one authority, and one command—and none of it included a triple formula or a Roman-invented name.
The Unifying Prophetic Command: One Name, One Branch
From the beginning, the navi’ím (prophets) proclaimed with absolute unity that deliverance, restoration, and covenant renewal would come through ONE Redeemer—the promised Branch—and never through multiple titles, philosophical constructs, or later Roman-Hellenized formulas. The prophets focused relentlessly on the specific, Redemptive Name of this coming Branch, not an abstract description.
- YashaYAHU revealed, “A Branch shall grow out of the stem of Yishai, and a shoot shall grow out of his roots” (Isaiah 11:1). This prophecy grounds the Messiah in the genealogy of David and the promised covenant, linking the kingly line directly to the source of salvation.
- YarmiYAHU testified, “I will raise unto Dawid a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper... and this is His Name whereby He shall be called, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) our righteousness” (Jeremiah 23:5–6). This is the key: the Branch is the manifestation of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄’s righteousness, embodied in a single Name that carries the divine identity.
- ZakarYAHU declared: “Behold the Man whose Name is the Branch” (Zechariah 6:12). The office, the identity, and the deliverance are essentially linked to the Name, making substitution impossible.
The testimony of the prophets is consistent: salvation is revealed through one Name, not through three titles.
Yo’al declared, “Whosoever shall call upon the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) shall be delivered” (Joel 2:32). Dawid cried, “Save me, O 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄, for Your Name’s sake” (Tahilliym (Psalms) 54:1). Names carry authority; titles do not. The prophetic line never introduced a tri-formula or a doctrinal chant. Instead, it pointed forward to the moment when the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) would be revealed in His Redeemer.
The Fulfillment in 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 and the Apostolic Practice
When 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha) came—𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) manifested in flesh—He fulfilled every prophetic expectation. His Name embodies His identity: 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha) = “𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) is deliverance.”
He proclaimed, “I have come in My Father’s Name” (Yahuchanan (John) 5:43). He upheld the Torah (MatithYAHU (Matthew) 5:17–19), demanded repentance (MatitYAHU (Matthew) 4:17), required obedience (Yahuchanan (John) 14:23), and taught immersion into His one Name, never three titles.
The sent ones (apostles) consistently practiced immersion in the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha). This uniform apostolic practice stands as the ultimate counter-proof to the single contradictory verse:
- (Acts 2:38) — immersed in the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha).
- (Acts 8:16) — immersed in the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha).
- (Acts 10:48) — commanded to be immersed in the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha).
- (Acts 19:5) — immersed in the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha).
- (Romans 6:3) — immersed into 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha).
- (Galatians 3:27) — immersed into 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha).
- (Colossians 2:12) — buried with Him in immersion.
Furthermore, early non-canonical documents like the Didache (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles)—dating to the first century—affirm the simplicity of the early practice and do not contain the triple formula.
This consistent witness exposes MatithYAHU 28:19 (as printed today) as the only contradictory text—a lone outlier standing against the entire apostolic record. Every historical quotation, every early manuscript reference, and every act of obedience recorded in Scripture confirms one Name, never a triple formula. By contrast, the modern wording of MatithYAHU 28:19 appears nowhere in the practices of the taught ones, nowhere in their writings, and nowhere in the earliest citations from those who knew the text before Rome reshaped it.
And according to the very standard of the Torah itself, no doctrine is allowed to stand on a single isolated verse. Dabariym (Deuteronomy) 19:15 declares plainly: “One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity or for any sin… at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.” Dabariym (Deuteronomy) 19:15
Only one printed line—absent from the earliest witnesses—stands alone. And no doctrine resting on a solitary, contradicted, historically disputed text can overturn the unified testimony of every prophet and every emissary of the Covenant.
The Blatant Historical Tampering: The Eusebius Revelation and the Nicene Lie
The most damning piece of historical evidence comes from the historian Eusebius of Caesarea. He possessed and quoted from manuscripts predating any we currently hold. The shocking truth is he quoted MatithYAHU 28:19 at least seventeen times—and never once included the triple formula. In works like his Demonstratio Evangelica (Book III, Chapter 6), he consistently cited the shorter, apostolic reading: “Go and make disciples of all nations in My Name.”
The abrupt shift occurred only after the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE. This council was convened by Emperor Constantine primarily to resolve the Arian Controversy—a critical dispute over whether the Son was co-eternal and co-equal with the Father. The triple formula was not a revelation of the Messiah, but a political and theological compromise enforced by Roman imperial authority designed to codify the relationship between the three aspects, assert the Son's deity, and enforce imperial unity. When the Roman creedal formula (Nicene Creed) was codified, Eusebius's own quotations changed to reflect the longer text. This historical proof confirms the prophetic pattern: ONE Name, not three titles. The triple-formula was imposed by legislative and enforced by decree, not revealed by prophecy or practiced by the apostles. This was not a theological evolution; it was a deliberate act to standardize worship and allegiance to the Romanized ecclesiastical structure.
The writings of the other apostles opposed this formula. Kapha (Peter) stated there is “no other Name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).
Yahuchanan (John) wrote that life is found in His Name (Yahuchanan (John) 20:31). Sha’ul (Paul) quoted Yo’al, affirming that salvation comes to those who call upon the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) (Romans 10:13).
Yahudah (Jude) urged the committed to contend for “the belief once delivered unto the qodashiym” (Jude 1:3), which contained no Roman additions.
The Lawlessness and Linguistic Substitution
Sha’ul warned of "another messiah, another breath, another good news” (2 Corinthians 11:4), appealing to those who "take pleasure in unrighteousness" (2 Thessalonians 2:12). This false portrayal removed the requirement for Torah and obedience, substituting it with lawlessness.
This lawless system was made manifest in the calculated replacement of the Torah's divine calendar: the Shabbat (the Seventh Day) was exchanged for Sun-day observance, and the Moadim (Consecrated Feast Days) were replaced with pagan-derived holidays like Easter and Christmas. These specific substitutions prove that the corrupted name and doctrine led directly to a system built upon deliberate covenant disobedience.
This corruption is tied to the scattering of the Hebrews (Dabariym (Deuteronomy) 32), who were sold "unto the Grecians" (Yo’al (Joel) 3:6). This created the historical context for the Law to be actively polluted by foreign influence, as documented in 1 Maccabees: "And laid open the book of the law, wherein the heathen had sought to paint the likeness of their images" (1 Maccabees 3:48).
And in truth, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) forbids alteration of His Word:
- “Add not to His words” (Mashaliym (Proverbs) 30:6).
- “You shall not add nor diminish” (Dabariym (Deuteronomy) 4:2).
- 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha) confirmed this command (MatithYAHU 5:19).
The Greek IESOUS is a linguistic substitution rooted in Hellenic tradition. 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha) means “𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 is deliverance,” containing the Father’s divine signature (𐤉𐤄𐤅). In contrast, Linguistically, the Greek form IESOUS entirely lacks the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 and is connected to the Greek deity Iesus—even carries phonetic similarities to Zeus—a clear marker of pagan insertion. This substitution did not just change a sound; it replaced the covenant-defining power of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 with a Greek construct. The later addition of the letter J in the 1500s further removed the Name through linguistic evolution, not divine authority.
The Evidence of the Hebrew Manuscripts
Analyzing the Hebrew texts of Matthew confirms the corruption:
The Older Hebrew Tradition (Shem-Tov)
The most ancient form in the core of Shem-Tob ben Yitshak Ibn Shaprut’s treatise, Even Bohan (c. 1380) does not include the trinitarian baptismal formula. It presents a shorter ending in MatithYAHU 28:19-20: "Go and teach them to carry out all the things which I have commanded you forever." This aligns with the short Eusebian form, reflecting the original apostolic command.
The Later Revised Version (Du Tillet)
In contrast, the Hebrew text published by Jean du Tillet in 1555 explicitly includes the full trinitarian command to conform to the standardized canonical texts of the Christian church. This shows a clear textual evolution where the formula was inserted to match the imposed religious norm.
History shows that Roman councils replaced the Name of the Branch with titles, formulas, creeds, and traditions. But access is not authority. The Word belongs to 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU'aH) alone. Every later insertion contradicting prophetic witness holds zero authority.
Living Witness: Deliverance in the One Name
From my own life, I stand as a witness that one Name delivered me, and it was not the name “jesus.” When darkness seized me and I tried to speak that church-given name, my mouth would not open and there was no power in it. When the true Name was revealed—𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha)—every chain broke instantly, and I woke drenched, shaking, and freed.
This personal deliverance confirms the truth: the triple-formula and the “jesus” construct are later inventions inserted to hide the Name that actually saves.
The Truth
No academic argument could ever outweigh this direct evidence. Deliverance came from one Name, and one Name only:
𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤏 (Yahusha)
The Word stands.
The Branch stands.
The Name stands.
As the elect of Yaaqob remember themselves in captivity, just as prophesied in Baruch 2:32—the revelation of not only His name has come to light—put the unchanged and eternal truth that 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU'aH) never created a triple title formula for salvation. Every lie of the vile that sought to divide what He established is collapsing beneath the weight of eternal truth. This is the season of uncovering, the appointed time when the hidden things conceived in darkness are brought into the light, exactly as it is written: “For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed; and nothing hidden that will not be made known.” (MatithYAHU (Matthew) 10:26)
This unveiling is not for the rebellious, nor for those who cling to the comfort of Roman inventions, but for those who seek the better promises—the redemption rooted in truth, sealed in the Name, and preserved for the remnant who refuse the lie.
Add comment
Comments