Before the shipping into slavery, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) had already declared another curse—that the once massive nation would be reduced down to a few in number (Deuteronomy 28:62). This shrinking of the people was a clear warning before the final scattering. The transatlantic slave trade itself was the foundation of this stripping. Men, women, and children were violently uprooted, shackled, and shipped across oceans, deliberately separated from kin and tribe so that all memory of their true identity would be erased. Unlike other peoples who carried language and history across borders, the Ibriym were cut off by force. This was the ultimate curse fulfilled: “And 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) shall scatter you among all people, from one end of the earth even unto the other; and there you shall serve other mighty ones... even wood and stone” (Deuteronomy 28:64). The curse of scattering was designed to leave them without their tongue, their customs, and their remembrance.

Leviticus 25:47–49 teaches that if a Hebrew became poor and sold himself into bondage, “after he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him.” This is the covenant right of the go’el—the near kinsman—whose duty was to buy back his brother or his brother’s inheritance so that the family line and heritage would not perish. We see this custom beautifully displayed in Bo’az, who redeemed Ruth and Naomi’s inheritance (Ruth 4:1–10). As the kinsman-redeemer, Bo’az stepped forward to raise up the name of the dead upon his inheritance, preserving the covenant lineage. This was the commanded heritage of Yashar’al: no family was to be cut off, for 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) set redemption into the very structure of their society. But under the curses, this covenant safety net was stripped away. When the Hebrews were taken on ships and scattered, there was no Bo’az, no brother, no redeemer permitted to ransom them. The very thing that identified them as a covenant people—the right of family redemption—was removed. They were sold, but “no man shall buy you” meant no relative would be allowed to act as the redeemer, no kin would deliver them out of slavery. This is the crushing weight of Deuteronomy 28:68: not just enslavement, but the severing of the covenant protection that ensured their heritage. Their inheritance was hidden, their names erased, their remembrance made to cease among men (Deuteronomy 32:26). Only 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) Himself could step into the role of Redeemer.

It is also important to make clear that not all so‑called Black people are of the tribes of Yashar’al. The curses did not fall on every dark‑skinned people. They came upon the covenant people who were carried away in ships, as prophesied in Deuteronomy 28:68: “And 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) shall bring you into Mitsrayim again with ships... and there you shall be sold to your enemies for male and female slaves, and no man shall buy you.” This unique sign—captivity by ships—marks who the true children of Yashar’al are. Many other people of darker skin across the earth did not experience this same fulfillment, proving that skin color alone does not define covenant identity.

When the tribes arrived in the lands of so‑called America, history shows that there were already dark‑skinned people dwelling there. The so‑called Native Americans, who were labeled “Indians” by Europeans, were already present. The crucial point, however, is that history confirms these indigenous people did not arrive by way of the slave ships—thus differentiating their covenant status from the people fulfilling the curses of Deuteronomy 28:68.

Even symbols of resistance were manufactured and redirected. The afro was turned into a political symbol. The Black power fist was absorbed into political branding. Events such as Juneteenth were commercialized, while "holidays" like Kwanzaa were invented outright in 1966 and sold as ancient tradition when they were not. Likewise, the adoption of the Pan-African flag, the dashiki fashion fad, and the boom of Afrocentric bookstores in the 1990s all became short-lived markers of identity—external forms without grounding in authentic truth.

The so-called Black church in America was not born from the covenant heritage of Yashar’al; it was engineered under slavery as part of the curses. Enslavers knew they could not erase Way in 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 (YaHU’aH) from the Hebrews they had captured, so they created a new system of worship to control them. Manuals like “How to Make a Negro Christian” were not myth—they contained explicit instructions on how to take the Hebrew captives, strip their names and language, and teach them falsehood of Christianity built on the image of their oppressors. The strategy was to wait for the first generation of enslaved Hebrews to die off, knowing the elders carried the memories of their homeland, their customs, and their covenant. During this time, the enslavers deliberately re-wrote the history the children would hear, forbade the true tongue, punished the mention of their AL’uah’s Name, and flooded their minds with a counterfeit good news. By the time the next generation was grown, the plan was that they would no longer know who they were, but would think of themselves as “Negro Christians” loyal to the very systems that oppressed them. This was the fulfillment of Deuteronomy 32:26, “I said, I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men,” and of the 400-year affliction promised to Abram in Barashiyth (Genesis) 15:13–14.

Furthermore, the modern corporate and governmental push for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) must be exposed as the system’s latest mechanism of management and control, not liberation. DEI institutionalizes identity fragmentation by emphasizing superficial differences (skin color, gender) while simultaneously prohibiting any discussion of true covenant heritage, divine law, or structural autonomy. It grants institutional validation and the promise of acceptance—a form of "table scraps"—to a select few who agree to operate within the established system’s framework, effectively neutralizing independent intellectual leadership and ensuring the manufactured identity remains centered on worldly definitions of "success" and "excellence" rather than divine truth.