WHAT IS “JESUS”?
A Pagan Name, Greco-Roman Deception, and Idolatrous Substitute for YAHUSHA
We proclaim with resolute conviction that “Jesus” is a deceptive name, alien to the Qadash truth of YAHUSHA, the true Mashiach of Yashar’al. This scroll unveils “Jesus” as a Greco-Roman fabrication, devised by the adversary to lead Yahudyim (Covenant People) astray from their B’rit with YaHU’aH Exodus 19:5–6. The call is to honor YAHUSHA’s Name, the only path to deliverance. Using “Jesus” draws Yashar’al into Hellenistic idolatry, forsaking the Torah and YaHU’aH’s Qadash Name Joel 2:32.
Etymology of Jesus: Tracing the Greco-Roman Path
The name “Jesus” conflicts with the Qadash truth of YAHUSHA’s Hebrew Name. This section traces its linguistic and pagan roots, exposing its role in misleading Yashar’al. The adversary wielded “Jesus” to fracture the B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. Restoring YAHUSHA’s Name restores Amat.
YAHUSHA, from Yasha (save) and Yahu (YaHU’aH), means “YaHU’aH saves,” per Hebrew Lexicons (c. 1000 BCE). Greek Iēsous (c. 100 CE) lacks Hebrew roots, with “sous” echoing Zeus, per Greek Etymological Studies. The letter “J” emerged in 1524 CE, per Oxford Linguistic History, making “Jesus” impossible in YAHUSHA’s time. The Septuagint (c. 250 BCE) avoids Iēsous for Hebrew names, per Alexandrian Texts. In Matthew 1:21, “Jesus” replaces YAHUSHA, fostering idolatry Isaiah 42:8.
Why Jesus Gained Widespread Acceptance
The name “Jesus” spread through Yashar’al’s exposure to Hellenistic ideologies, defying YaHU’aH’s B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. This section explores how syncretism embedded “Jesus” in worship. The adversary exploited this to obscure Torah’s Amat. Yahudyim must return to YAHUSHA’s Name.
Greek papyri (c. 100 CE) use Iēsous in Christian texts, per Oxyrhynchus Records. Origen’s Contra Celsum (c. 248 CE) defends Iēsous, adopting Greek norms, per Patristic Writings. Athenian altars (c. 300 BCE) honor Zeus, per Greek Archaeology. Yahudite assimilation is condemned in Zechariah 13:2, per Prophetic Texts. Torah rejects pagan names Exodus 23:13, shunning “Jesus” as idolatrous Deuteronomy 18:20.
Syncretism Unveiled: Pagan Jesus in Covenant Worship
The name “Jesus” distorted YAHUSHA’s Qadash identity in B’rit worship. This section exposes how Greco-Roman traditions merged “Jesus” with Zeus, leading Yahudyim into idolatry. The adversary engineered this syncretism to fracture the B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. Rejecting “Jesus” restores Amat.
The Samaritan Chronicles (c. 400 BCE) preserve YAHUSHA’s Name, per Samaritan Texts. Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History (c. 325 CE) uses Iēsous, reflecting Nicaean norms, per Patristic Records. Ephesus statues (c. 200 BCE) depict Zeus, per Hellenistic Art. Torah condemns false names Deuteronomy 18:20, demanding YAHUSHA John 5:43.
Conquerors and Qadash Names: Controlling Worship
Roman empires imposed “Jesus” to suppress YAHUSHA’s Qadash Name, leading Yashar’al into rebellion. This section examines how conquerors entrenched “Jesus” to control B’rit worship. The adversary obscured Amat Exodus 19:5–6. Restoring YAHUSHA’s Name aligns with the B’rit Hadashah.
Constantine’s edicts (c. 325 CE) mandated Iēsous, per Nicaean Records. The Vulgate (c. 400 CE) uses Iesus, per Latin Texts. Roman temples (c. 100 CE) honored Zeus, per Imperial Archaeology. Torah rejects false names Deuteronomy 18:20, commanding YAHUSHA John 5:43.
It Is Implied
The name “Jesus” was subtly adopted in Yashar’al’s practices, masking its idolatrous nature. This section reveals how “Jesus” was implicitly accepted, causing B’rit betrayal. The adversary fostered this deception Exodus 19:5–6. Yahudyim must reject “Jesus” to uphold Amat.
Antioch texts (c. 150 CE) use Iēsous, per Early Christian Papyri. The Epistle of Barnabas (c. 100 CE) promotes Iēsous, blending Greek norms, per Patristic Texts. Corinthian inscriptions (c. 200 BCE) honor Zeus, per Greek Epigraphy. In Acts 4:12, “Jesus” replaces YAHUSHA, promoting idolatry Ezekiel 20:39. Torah demands YAHUSHA’s Name John 5:43.
Embracing YAHUSHA’s Name: A Compassionate Journey
Honoring YAHUSHA’s Qadash Name restores B’rit fidelity, rejecting “Jesus.” This section guides Yahudyim to abandon the pagan name. The adversary obscures YAHUSHA’s truth, but the B’rit Hadashah illuminates the path Exodus 19:5–6. With compassion, we urge Shalum.
The Hasmonean Seals (c. 150 BCE) use YaHU’aH’s Name, per Maccabean Artifacts. The Murabba’at Texts (c. 100 CE) preserve YAHUSHA, per Second Temple Records. Torah commands rejecting idols Exodus 23:13, shunning “Jesus” Deuteronomy 18:20. Steps to embrace YAHUSHA’s Name:
Study Qadash Names: Explore John 5:43 to reject “Jesus.”
Honor YAHUSHA: Teach His Name using B’rit terms.
Join Qadash Community: Unite with Yahudyim rejecting pagan names.
Share Compassionately: Guide others from “Jesus” with care.
Covenant Impact of YAHUSHA’s Name: Three Qadash Examples
YAHUSHA’s Qadash Name transforms Yahudyim, surpassing “Jesus.” This section presents three historical examples of B’rit fidelity through honoring YAHUSHA’s Name, rejecting idolatry. The adversary cannot suppress this Amat Exodus 19:5–6. These urge Yashar’al to embrace YAHUSHA.
The Yavneh Inscriptions (c. 100 BCE) use YaHU’aH’s Name, per Judean Records. The Essene Writings (c. 100 BCE) reject Hellenistic names, per Qumran Texts. Examples of B’rit fidelity:
Josiah’s Reforms: Yahudyim (c. 620 BCE) restored YaHU’aH’s Name, rejecting idols 2 Kings 23:24, per Deuteronomistic History.
Hasmonean Revival: Yahudyim (c. 140 BCE) upheld Hebrew names 1 Maccabees 4:36, per Maccabean Texts.
Exilic Yahudyim: Yahudyim in Persia (c. 450 BCE) preserved YaHU’aH’s Name Nehemiah 1:11, per Persian Archives.
Jesus in Modern Culture: A Diluted Trope
The name “Jesus” persists in modern culture, devoid of YAHUSHA’s Qadash truth. This section examines its misuse in media and worship, perpetuating deception. The adversary exploits “Jesus” to obscure Amat Exodus 19:5–6. Rejecting “Jesus” honors YAHUSHA.
The ESV Bible (2001) uses “Jesus,” ignoring YAHUSHA, per Translation Studies. Renaissance art (c. 1500 CE) depicts “Jesus” as Cesare Borgia, per Art History. Greek coins (c. 300 BCE) honor Zeus, per Numismatic Records. Torah commands YAHUSHA’s Name John 5:43, rejecting “Jesus” as demonic Deuteronomy 18:20.
The Rebellion: Comfort Over Covenant
Choosing “Jesus” over YAHUSHA’s Qadash Name reflects rebellion, favoring ease over B’rit Amat. This section explores how traditions entrenched “Jesus,” leading to idolatry. The adversary sustains this deception Exodus 19:5–6. Yashar’al must reject “Jesus.”
The 1611 KJV uses Iesus, later “Jesus,” per Biblical Translation History. Medieval icons (c. 1000 CE) depict “Jesus” as Zeus-like, per Byzantine Art. Torah condemns false names Deuteronomy 18:20, demanding YAHUSHA John 5:43.
Who Uses Jesus?
Using “Jesus” exalts the adversary, not YAHUSHA, the Redeemer of Yashar’al. This section declares that “Jesus” aligns with demonic forces, not the B’rit Exodus 19:5–6. The adversary crafted “Jesus” to deceive Yahudyim. Only YAHUSHA’s Name ensures deliverance.
The Peshitta (c. 150 CE) uses YAHUSHA, per Aramaic Texts. Roman mosaics (c. 300 CE) depict Zeus-like figures, per Classical Art. Torah commands YAHUSHA’s Name John 5:43, rejecting “Jesus” as demonic 2 Corinthians 11:4.
Call to Action: Return to YAHUSHA’s Name
Now is the time for Yashar’al to reject “Jesus” and restore YAHUSHA’s Qadash Name, shattering the adversary’s deception. This section calls Yahudyim to reclaim B’rit Amat through YAHUSHA’s B’rit Hadashah Exodus 19:5–6. The adversary cannot prevail against YAHUSHA’s Name. Honor YAHUSHA for Shalum.
The Yahad Texts (c. 100 BCE) exalt YaHU’aH’s Name, per Qumran Records. The Aramaic Targums (c. 100 CE) use YAHUSHA, per Translation Studies. YaHU’aH is AL Alyon, YAHUSHA the Redeemer who restores Amat, and “Jesus” is a Greco-Roman lie John 5:43. Repent, embrace YAHUSHA Acts 4:12, and flee Babylon Revelation 18:4. Ahmayn (So be it).
