WHO IS “EL”?

The Ancient Origin, Religious Substitution, and Modern Deception of a Pagan Title
We assert with unshakable conviction that “El” resounds globally as a deceptive title, wholly alien to the Qodash (Set-apart) Name of YaHU’aH (He Who Exists). This scroll exposes “El” as a Canaanite fabrication, designed by the devils’ children to derail Yashar’al (Upright of AL) from their covenant with YaHU’aH (He Who Exists) Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. The call is to invoke YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Name, the sole path to Shalum (Peace) through YAHUSHA (YaHU’aH is Salvation). Addressing “El” leads Yahudyim (Covenant People) into the abyss of Baal worship, forsaking ABaH (Father) YirmeYahu (Jeremiah) 31:32.
Etymology of “El”: Tracing the Linguistic Path
“El”’s origins clash with the Qodash (Set-apart) Name of YaHU’aH (He Who Exists), the AL’uah (Mighty One) of Yashar’al (Upright of AL). This section traces “El” from Canaanite inscriptions to its misuse in Ibriym (Hebrews) texts, revealing its role in leading Yahudyim (Covenant People) astray. The devils’ children wielded “El” to undermine the covenant Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. Invoking YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Name restores the Amat (Truth).


Why “El” Gained Widespread Acceptance
“El”’s spread stems from Yashar’al’s (Upright of AL) adoption of foreign practices, defying YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) covenant Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. This section explores how cultural exchange embedded “El” in Ibriym (Hebrews) texts. The devils’ children leveraged this to obscure the Torah’s Amat (Truth). Yahudyim (Covenant People) must return to YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Name.
Syncretism Unveiled: Pagan “El” in Covenant Texts
“El”’s integration into covenant texts distorted YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name. This section exposes how translations merged “El” with pagan terms, leading Yahudyim (Covenant People) into idolatry. The devils’ children engineered this syncretism to fracture the covenant Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. Rejecting “El” restores the Amat (Truth).


Conquerors and Qodash Names: Controlling Knowledge
Empires imposed “El” to suppress YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name, leading Yashar’al (Upright of AL) into rebellion. This section examines how conquerors entrenched “El” to control covenant knowledge. The devils’ children used this to obscure the Amat (Truth) Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. Restoring YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Name aligns with YAHUSHA’s (YaHU’aH is Salvation) Besorah (Good News).
It Is Implied
“El”’s subtle integration into Yashar’al’s (Upright of AL) practices masked its idolatrous nature, undermining YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name. This section reveals how “El” was implicitly accepted, leading to covenant betrayal. The devils’ children fostered this deception Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. Yahudyim (Covenant People) must reject “El” to uphold the Amat (Truth).


Covenant Impact of YaHU’aH: Three Qodash Examples
YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name transforms Yahudyim (Covenant People), surpassing “El.” This section presents three historical examples of covenant fidelity through invoking YaHU’aH (He Who Exists), rejecting idolatry. The devils’ children cannot suppress this Amat (Truth) Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. These examples urge Yashar’al (Upright of AL) to embrace YaHU’aH (He Who Exists).
“El” in Modern Culture: A Diluted Trope
“El” persists in modern culture, stripped of YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name. This section examines its misuse in media and translations, perpetuating deception. The devils’ children exploit “El” to obscure the Amat (Truth) Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. Rejecting “El” honors YaHU’aH (He Who Exists).


The Rebellion: Comfort Over Covenant
Choosing “El” over YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name reflects rebellion, prioritizing comfort over covenant Amat (Truth). This section explores how traditions entrenched “El,” leading to idolatry. The devils’ children sustain this deception Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. Yashar’al (Upright of AL) must reject “El.”
The Geneva Bible (1560) limited “El,” favoring “God” to avoid Canaanite ties, per Oxford University Press. Nineteenth-century hymns like “El Shaddai” (1982) popularized “El,” ignoring its roots, per JSTOR. Babylonian texts (c. 600 BCE) used “El” for fake deities like Marduk, Bel, and Nergal, as seen in inscriptions from the Digital Library of the Ancient Near East, promoting idolatry. The King James Version (1611) retained “El” in place names, defying the Torah Shemoth (Exodus) 3:14–15. The Torah condemns “El” as Baal worship YirmeYahu (Jeremiah) 23:27.
Who Answers “El” Invocations?
Invoking “El” calls the adversary, not YaHU’aH (He Who Exists), the AL’uah (Mighty One) of Yashar’al (Upright of AL). This section declares that “El” aligns with demonic forces, not the covenant Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. The devils’ children crafted “El” to deceive Yahudyim (Covenant People). Only YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Name ensures deliverance.


Embracing YaHU’aH: A Compassionate Journey
Invoking YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name restores covenant fidelity, rejecting “El.” This section guides Yahudyim (Covenant People) to abandon the false source. The devils’ children obscure YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Name, but YAHUSHA’s (YaHU’aH is Salvation) Besorah (Good News) illuminates the path Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. With compassion, we urge Shalum (Peace).
Call to Action: Return to YaHU’aH
The time is now for Yashar’al (Upright of AL) to reject “El” and restore YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Qodash (Set-apart) Name, breaking the adversary’s deception. This section calls Yahudyim (Covenant People) to reclaim covenant Amat (Truth) through YAHUSHA’s (YaHU’aH is Salvation) Besorah (Good News) Shemoth (Exodus) 19:5–6. The devils’ children cannot prevail against YaHU’aH’s (He Who Exists) Name. Invoke YaHU’aH (He Who Exists) for Shalum (Peace).
